Comparison
Co vs Jørnal
A factual side by side of two tools in Indie AI Tools. Figures come from each product’s own site.
Co
ListedEvery AI coding agent signs its commits with a forgeable plain-text line.
Jørnal
ListedYesterday's entry is on the page above, read it whenever; it can't be rewritten.
| Co | Jørnal | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Indie AI Tools | Indie AI Tools |
| Pricing model | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Starting price | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Free tier | No | No |
| Platforms | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Techavy score | Not rated yet | Not rated yet |
About Co
Every AI coding agent signs its commits with a forgeable plain-text line. Co-authored-by is a Lie: Cryptographic Provenance for AI Coding Agents . It matters now, because the attribution metadata is starting to be used to make trust decisions, and that turns a cosmetic line into an attack surface. Commit metadata has always been trivial to fake unless signing is enforced. So over a couple of evenings I built the missing half: a producer-attribution layer where attribution is backed by a hardware key, enforced automatically, and verifiable .
About Jørnal
Yesterday's entry is on the page above, read it whenever; it can't be rewritten. A backup that runs without you having to remember. Find what you wrote, even when you can't remember the exact words. Cancel any time; you will never lose what you've written.
Neither placement on this page is paid. Outbound links are nofollow. How we rate tools