docs.dev vs Ship

Point your coding agent at your repo and your docs; it opens a docs branch, your team reviews on the rendered page, publishing is a commit. Runs on your Cloudflare, no...

Assign an issue to SHIP. An agent team of specialists autonomously covers your SDLC, following your practices, verifying, proving, and reporting every change.

About docs.dev

Point your coding agent at your repo and your docs; it opens a docs branch, your team reviews on the rendered page, publishing is a commit. Runs on your Cloudflare, no platform fee, no metered AI. Reviews, branches, and rollbacks come free, because it is just git. Your content in their database, and an export button you hope works when you leave. Writing AI is the agent you already have; reader-facing AI runs on your Workers AI.

About Ship

Assign an issue to SHIP. An agent team of specialists autonomously covers your SDLC, following your practices, verifying, proving, and reporting every change. It lands faster than teams can verify its quality or account for its cost. Teams pick their own agents, tools, and models, and nothing connects that choice to what ships or the uneven quality it ships at. As agent adoption grows, that gap becomes unreviewed code, unpredictable spend, and outcomes no one can attribute.