Comparison
Nano vs Selfship
A factual side by side of two tools in Hosting & Devtools. Figures come from each product’s own site.
Nano
ListedAn AI-native security and observability platform for cloud, local, hybrid, and air-gapped teams. Sub-second search, detection engineering, OpenTelemetry, pivt AI, and...
Selfship
ListedWhen 300 customers hit the same wall, Selfship finds the exact moment it goes wrong and opens an eval-backed pull request. You review, you merge.
| Nano | Selfship | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Hosting & Devtools | Hosting & Devtools |
| Pricing model | Open Source | Paid |
| Starting price | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Free tier | No | No |
| Platforms | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Techavy score | Not rated yet | Not rated yet |
About Nano
An AI-native security and observability platform for cloud, local, hybrid, and air-gapped teams. Sub-second search, detection engineering, OpenTelemetry, pivt AI, and deployment control in one place. Run nano in the cloud, locally, hybrid, or air-gapped. nano was built from scratch, not refactored: a dedicated cluster, one query language over your security and OpenTelemetry data, agentic investigation, and deployment options from cloud to air-gapped. So when a service slows down, "is this an outage or a breach?" is one query, not two tools and a guess.
About Selfship
When 300 customers hit the same wall, Selfship finds the exact moment it goes wrong and opens an eval-backed pull request. You review, you merge. Your live traffic shows what to fix next, and the loop handles the rest. Selfship reads what each customer was trying to do, and whether they got it. A proposed change lands in your GitHub with eval evidence attached, impact, sample sessions, and scores you can audit in the PR.
Neither placement on this page is paid. Outbound links are nofollow. How we rate tools